How Working With Children is a Good Way to Improve Your Leadership Skills
For me to write a blog article I have to be excited and energized about a specific topic. This passion generally comes from a specific topic or something happening in my business or personal life. Both my business and personal life are full because I am a unit leader, husband, parent and coach. As much as I learn from my experiences in business, I learn equally as much working with children in sports. It is amazing to me how many parallels you see between the two. The interesting part of coaching is that you see the immediate impact of your decisions. This is not just in the outcome of the score board, but from the fact that children often speak quite openly and have a harder time masking their disappointments or frustrations.
I have coached many teams both for competitive and recreational clubs. During this time I have witnessed that coaches have very different leadership styles that create varying results and cultures.
One coach may use a truly authoritarian style while another mixes authoritarian and participative style. Now I must point out the authoritarian style works when dealing with some children at this stage in their development (remember a leader’s style should suit a follower’s readiness). That being said, when you lead you must adjust to other people in the organization to be truly effective (in this case team managers and assistant coaches). However the type of leadership style you utilize is only one factor as you must also consider how the message is delivered to your group.
While I believe strong organizational skills and procedures are important, how we develop and work with people is more important in long term success. Let us for example say one coach is highly organized and utilizes every moment with the kids. This style brings practices that are quite focused. However, if the delivery method the coach uses is negative than the long term impact on the team may also be negative. Negativity may include pointing out errors a specific player makes or the coach may even create a nickname to reinforce the message. This form of reinforcement would be considered bullying if it was between children but some coaches believe that it is motivating when coming from a person in authority, this is also true of some managers in the workplace.
Now if we compare this to a second coach who may lack some organization in how they prepare for a night’s practice, and ask for input from assistant coaches or even some players. While some might think this is a lack of confidence, the person is actually trying to run a flat organization. While the practices are not as effective in this manner, the coach does improve the player’s skills by pointing out a player who has just performed a particular drill with excellence.
So how may these two differing styles impact each team? Well, short term the team whose coach runs the highly organized practice will most likely see immediate success in winning the first few games, while the other team may lose. Does this result support that style more? I would say definitely not. After the first team continues to get negative feedback, players and parents will becomes discouraged and may give up on the team or worse the sport all together. The other team however, although losing to begin with, will remain positive about their overall play and the players themselves will continue to work harder to improve. I have seen this happen first hand on different occasions and based on history, the long term results for the positive coach’s team will typically be stronger.
These practices can also be applied to business leadership. A leader must adjust their style to their group’s skills, abilities and engagement. A leader must also realize that a particular group may need different leadership styles based on different tasks. It is part of effective leadership to understand and adjust to the group or individual’s needs.
More important to that is how you deliver your message. I am not going to say that you must always utilize positive support to address change. That would be impossible as certain actions do need to be addressed and corrected from time to time. This style however should be only used occasionally.
There are two very good reasons to adopt this leadership adaptation style. The first is simply that people react better when treated with dignity and respect and they will want to follow you. You will most certainly see the impact of this in your results. The second is that if you have to be strict it will be much more effective if used when only absolutely necessary. People with constant negativity are eventually tuned out, but when someone who is typically positive becomes upset it causes everyone to stop and pay attention. Above all do not use nicknames or be disrespectful. Even when a leader feels they must utilize an autocratic approach, this can still be done in a professional manner.
It is amazing what children can teach us in all aspects of our lives. I know coaching youth teams has made me a better leader.
Lorne
Market Matters
The new issue of Outokumpu’s Market Matters is available. Downloaded it here
Happy Unofficial Start to Summer
With Canada’s Victoria day last weekend, the United States’ Memorial Day and multiple European banking holidays yesterday, we have entered the unofficial start of summer. So what does that mean for the economy and projects?
Here are some articles with insights that look both short and long term:
Economy still moving despite European situation
How the summer season impacts the economy
G8 submit on the impact if Europe does fail
So while we all want to think of relaxing by the water and enjoying the lazy days of summer, perhaps this is the best time for business. Hope you and your company make the most out of this summer season before it passes us all by.
Cheers,
Lorne
Bottom Up Business Model: The Way of the Future?
Recent job cuts by the federal government hit the nation’s capital region hard, as did the high tech meltdown in 2002, the global economic flop in 2008, and the death of Nortel in 2009. This brings to the forefront the stability of the business ecosystem in both the public and private sector. It wasn’t that long ago when all I knew was that the public sector was the way of the future and the cash for life route, times are changing and the entrepreneurial bug within and strong minded personalities need to shine through. Stimulating our local economy will always have an effect on what the big man decides to impose on his government’s decisions and inevitably affect thousands of family’s nations wide. So this raises the question: is the top-down business model the way of the future, or would the contrast allow for a more dependable economy?
Gaining input from all levels of employees virtually doesn’t exist in a top down organization model; this is the case with the public service. This structure allows for a certain level of control yet very little input. In contrast, a bottom up business model looks to generate ideas from the vast brainpower you are buying into by paying salaries, using all your resources so to speak, in developing your company’s mechanisms to reach your goals. This can reap benefits by giving a sense of morale and ownership in the overall direction of the company, and be a huge strategic player in keeping doors open into new markets. The bottom up model demonstrates an understanding of the probable markets and is key to market development; it welcomes advice from potential customers as well as experts which can reduce the risk and the cost of failures.
Some food for thought on this Friday afternoon!
Cheers,
Stuart
Tubular Selection Tools to Help
This week we wanted to provide information on our core business – Tubular Products.
Here are some helpful tools for purchasers and engineers.
Working Pressure Calculator for Pipe and Fittings
These tools are meant to increase your efficiency when designing or choosing the materials needed for a project build. These helpful apps and more can be found on the OSTP web portal
Cheers,
Lorne














